Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 June 2026

Film Review - Steven Spielberg's Disclosure Day

Steven Spielberg’s original sci-fi thriller “Disclosure Day” has been released this month. I decided to review this film. Steven Spielberg directed, produced and wrote the story for “Disclosure Day”. The screenplay is written by David Koepp who’s worked with Steven on multiple films with their most successful collaboration being 1993’s “Jurassic Park”. I’m embedding the trailer from YouTube and will be reviewing the film below.
 

Disclosure Day is set in a world on the brink of a nuclear World War III. This brings parallels to the world we live in right now as we are dealing with wars and inappropriate actions by world leaders that cause unnecessary tensions between countries. The Iran War is a global catastrophe we are facing this year. In the film, there is a company called Wardex who does work for the US government and military which consists of involvement in extraterrestrial interactions and the cover up of their existence. Cybersecurity administrator Dr. Daniel Kellner stole the full archive of proof of the alien presence on earth from Wardex which has videos over the last 79 years that began with the Roswell incident. Daniel’s working for Hugo Wakefield, another ex-Wardex employee, who is involved in disclosing to the whole world the truth that we are not alone and the alien presence on our planet.


Wardex, who is against what Daniel is doing, got his girlfriend Jane Blankenship involved. They are led by Noah Scanlon who is the film's villain. Noah has access to an alien technology called “The Device” that he holds in his hand which allows him to appear to people located elsewhere and he can control their body movements. There is a sequence where he appears to Jane and controls her which is terrifying. The Device is a form of technology I love in the film. It’s also used by other characters for different purposes later on which I won’t spoil.


Parallel to Daniel’s story is the one of Margaret Fairchild, a weather presenter. She gains special abilities which include the ability to speak different languages. She suddenly speaks in Russian to her boyfriend Jackson at home and speaks Korean to a Korean professor at the TV station she works at. I like the inclusion of Korean as I watch Korean TV shows. While presenting the weather, she suddenly breaks into an alien language on TV and collapses. Moving back to Daniel, he also gains special abilities. This includes the ability to understand the alien language Margaret was speaking. This was a message by the aliens. This is where Margaret and Daniel’s stories begin to intersect. They do eventually meet and work together on the disclosure.


I think “Disclosure Day” has a great tone. When sci-fi films are done as sci-fi dramas, that isn’t my favourite sci-fi sub-genre, as it has the risk of being too slow and not very engaging for me. Steven Spielberg made a brilliant creative decision to make this film both an alien first contact story and a fast-paced thriller. While drama is one of the film’s genres, this film’s style is clearly that of a sci-fi thriller. It’s very thrilling and engaging. Action isn’t the focus of the film, but it does have action as the heroes are chased by Wardex who are trying to stop the disclosure. Daniel is involved in two exciting car chase sequences, one with his girlfriend Jane and the other with Margaret where they get pushed onto the train tracks.


Regarding Daniel’s character, we get few details of his backstory. I’m not keen on what he has done in the past for moral reasons, but more importantly his character in the present is a good hero for this story. I like the fact that the male lead of this film is born in 1990 (we see his date of birth on the screen) making him the same age as me. The female lead Margaret goes through a challenging experience in this film where she doesn’t understand what’s happening to her. She tells people she encounters facts and advice for their personal life which brings to mind the precog Agatha from Steven Spielberg’s brilliant sci-fi action thriller “Minority Report” who did something similar.


I’d like to expand on political parallels in this film I mentioned earlier. The current US administration is a dangerously incompetent one that constantly lies and is creating unnecessary division among people. In this film, the US government hired Wardex to suppress the truth about aliens which brings some similarities. In fact screenwriter David Koepp in a "Disclosure Day” interview with Polygon called “Steven Spielberg's new sci-fi movie probes a 'question of faith' about aliens and government lies” mentioned the problem of how much the current US government lies.


My biggest issue with “Disclosure Day” is that we don’t get to see enough of the aliens. I would have liked to have found out more details about why the aliens came to earth, what Wardex and the government were doing to the aliens. UFOs aren’t really featured in the film like I wanted. As an Elton John fan, I would have liked his UFO themed song “I’ve Seen the Saucers” to be included in “Disclosure Day”. The alien story didn’t offer anything new about aliens in government cover-ups. However, this film makes up for that in Steven Spielberg’s great execution.


I had earlier mentioned the full Wardex archive of alien encounters Daniel had stolen for the public good. This archive consists of videos going all the way back to the Roswell incident. We see people watching them on screens. Other videos featured on screens are those in the Wardex headquarters playing on the walls. These videos seem to be related to alien encounters throughout the world which Wardex uses to suppress knowledge of alien existence. I think the videos from both the archive and the ones playing at Wardex would be good extras for the film’s Blu-ray release. We could see some of those videos extended and perhaps even a few which were made for the film and got cut out.


I do see similarities with the 1960s sci-fi TV series “The Invaders” I like. Both of them are conspiracy thrillers about aliens on earth which the public doesn’t know about. Both Daniel Kellner and David Vincent in the show are trying to expose the truth. It differs in a major way as the film is the reverse of the show with “The Invaders” being about an alien invasion, but “Disclosure Day” has the humans being the aggressors.


I felt some of the visual effects animation wasn’t the strongest and could have been better. I thought the practical effects of the chase scenes involving a car smashing into a house and the train sequence were impressive. I have an issue with the film ending suddenly as I would like to know what happens after it. I wouldn’t call the film’s ending bad as there are good ideas involving aliens and the viewer can use their imagination of what will happen following the ending.


A theme of this film is the importance of empathy. I’m not sure if this theme came across as effectively as Steven Spielberg intended, but I welcome its inclusion. If aliens do exist and have been coming to earth for 79 years, a disclosure day could be a positively unifying moment for humanity. This message of empathy is what we need in the world right now as I’m displeased with the state of humanity at present. I don’t like the violence, cynicism and division that is so prevalent.


Disclosure Day is not the brilliant masterpiece I hoped for, but it’s also not the disappointment I feared. Steven Spielberg’s brilliant directing shines throughout the film and is more important than the issues I have with it. It’s great to have an original blockbuster in this age of sequels, adaptations, remakes and reboots. I had been wanting Steven Spielberg to make an original sci-fi film for years, so I’m glad he finally made one. This entertaining film is deeper, more intelligent and creative than the typical franchise films which are often over focused on action. I recommend “Disclosure Day” as a film to see.

Tuesday, 25 June 2019

Star Trek: The Original Series Twitter Showcase



As a Star Trek fan whose favourite Star Trek series is “Star Trek: The Original Series”, I decided to
compile a collection of tweets about the show as well as some of the Original Series films from the
website Twitter. Tweets are posts which are 280 characters or less. Some of these tweets have
images. I’m grouping these tweets into different sections and will be providing commentary in some
cases. Let’s begin.  


USS Enterprise
This section deals with the crew’s iconic starship the USS Enterprise featuring both the Enterprise
from the TV series and the Enterprise from the Original Series films. It features models of the
Enterprise. The first one below is from the TV Series.





The following two tweets are from Star Trek Starships, the Twitter page of “Star Trek: The Official
Starships Collection”. They feature fan pictures of their models of the Original Series TV Enterprise
and the Original Series film Enterprise.








The following tweet by Ben Robinson who runs “Star Trek: The Official Starships Collection” features
a large model of the Enterprise-A from the films to commemorate Star Trek’s 50th Anniversary in
2016.





Vulcan 
These are a collection of tweets about Spock, his planet/species Vulcan and the actor who portrayed
the original Spock Leonard Nimoy.











This is Leonard Nimoy directing the fourth Star Trek film “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home” in
character.





This is the official Star Trek Twitter page reporting Leonard Nimoy’s death 4 years ago. The next two
tweets were posted just after his death. RIP Leonard Nimoy. You did an incredible job portraying my
favourite Star Trek character Spock.





As a fan of both Star Trek & Elton John, I was pleased that Elton John dedicated a song of his in
concert to Leonard Nimoy following his death. I’d like to point that Leonard Nimoy’s character is
actually Mr. Spock. :)





The following two tweets are from visitors to the Canadian town of Vulcan, Alberta which embraces
Star Trek due to its name. 








All The Rest
The following is a grouping of tweets covering a range of Original Series issues.







I think this tweet is spot-on about the “Where No Man Has Gone Before” episode, as I think that this
episode is probably set in an alternate universe. The reason I think so is because the uniforms were
different, the Enterprise crew was a bit different, I don’t believe the character of Gary Mitchell & his
fate was ever mentioned again and it suggested that Captain James Kirk’s middle initial was R
instead of T as established later on. I’d be interested to hear other people’s thoughts on this in the
comments.








This is a good joke by Doctor McCoy on the state of 20th century medicine in the 1986 film “Star
Trek IV: The Voyage Home” where the crew travels back in time to that year. I’ll end this section with
this good piece of artwork featuring Captain Kirk, Spock, Dr. McCoy and Scotty below.





Legacy
I’ll conclude this blog post with two tweets on the show’s legacy.












Sunday, 4 September 2016

Film Review: Star Trek Beyond

The latest Star Trek film Star Trek Beyond was released in most of the world in late July and I’d like to share my thoughts on the film. I am aware that many fans like or love this film and I respect that. This is simply my opinion of it. I wanted to like this film, but didn’t end up doing so as I had a mixed reaction. Regarding the new films I’ll say that I have some issues with this alternate universe that these films are set in (officially known as the Kelvin Timeline), but ultimately I liked the 2009 Star Trek film and disliked its sequel Star Trek Into Darkness (2013). I went into more detail about my thoughts on the first two films in my very first blog post here. I’ll begin with the positive issues of this film.

The film looked good visually. It’s uniforms, ship designs, sets, layout of the planet and the planet designs were very faithful to Star Trek. Parts of the planet seem reminiscent of a planet visited by the crew in Star Trek: The Original Series. It’s good how this film dealt with exploration in a way that the previous two films didn’t, as this film didn’t have any scenes taking place on earth. It was nice to see quite a few alien species in this film. While there are some qualities of this alternate version of Captain Kirk I’m not into, I do like it how in this film Captain Kirk was more mature than before. I didn’t like it how in Star Trek Into Darkness, Captain Kirk and Spock didn’t seem to get along well when that story began, so am pleased that they didn’t get into an argument in this film, though they did not spend a lot of screen time together in this film.

I’ll now go into some negative issues of the film. I found the film’s story to be weak, and an over-focus on action scenes. I thought the film lacked energy and soul. There were some jokes in the film that I didn’t enjoy. I wasn’t fond of the usage of a few rap songs in the film.

When Director Justin Lin spoke of the villain Krall, he spoke of Krall having a valid point of view and exploring the theme of some alien cultures disliking the Federation. Krall to me was just a tough violent character without much depth. When they finally revealed the full details of Krall, it seemed to contradict the message Justin had been saying. Yes, the film did speak of unity when working against Krall, but to me there wasn’t any discussion about the Federation through his character. I won’t reveal what Krall’s true identity is, but his true identity and background ended up being what I find to be a character type overdone in Star Trek.

It’s disappointing to me, as Star Trek: The Original Series is the Star Trek series I like the most, I want these films to give me similar feelings I get when watching the original characters and I didn’t get that with this film.

The film wasn’t bad, it’s just that I had too many issues with it to consider it to be a good film. I found it better than the previous film Star Trek Into Darkness that I didn’t like which is a positive. It had good moments throughout, some related to Star Trek but the film as a whole didn’t work together. Some elements of this film such the exploring theme and Captain Kirk’s performance improved upon the 2009 film, but the issues I mentioned resulted in my lowered opinion of it. I thought it was half a Star Trek film, half a generic Sci-Fi Action film. I also think Justin Lin’s directing style doesn’t appeal to me as the way he edited it, paced it and the tone wasn’t one I enjoyed.

I hope that for the next Star Trek film, which was was announced just before Star Trek Beyond opened, they will find a Director who is not famous for directing action, but for story and intelligence as I feel those two factors are needed the most in these new films. While I am aware that the new films will have action, I dislike the overemphasis on action as displayed in the last two films. I know the sequel to this film is unlikely to have good storytelling and intelligence, so what’s most important for me is for the film to feel like Star Trek, have more depth & substance, a stronger villain, be paced better and be a good entertaining film which I unfortunately didn’t find this one to be.

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

Thoughts on the Recent Star Trek Beyond Trailer

A few weeks ago, the first full trailer debuted for the film Star Trek Beyond which will be released in late July. I wasn’t fond of the teaser trailer that came out in December and I gave my thoughts on the film in my very first blog post in January. While I wouldn’t call this trailer incredible, I think it’s so much better than December’s teaser and is fairly good. I will embed the trailer here if anyone wants to see it before I give my thoughts on the trailer.




I’ll start off with the negative issues. I didn’t like it how Captain Kirk seemed to be implying to Dr. McCoy that he joined Starfleet for the wrong reasons. This looks like the filmmakers are still going with a Captain Kirk who is not mature enough. I know this is an Alternate Universe where things are different, but he’s been Captain for some time now, especially as this film takes place two and a half years into their five year mission. I really want to see this Captain Kirk having the leadership qualities we know and love, and still hope that at least some of that will be there in the film. I didn’t like the moment when Spock and Uhura kissed, as I don’t like it how in these recent films these two have a relationship. I do have some concerns the action in the film may be too fast paced and over the top.


I’ll now move on into the positives. I really like the shot of Captain Kirk, Spock and Dr. McCoy together as with the original characters, there was a great focus on the friendship between these three. It seems unlikely that this film will focus on that friendship, but it is good to see a moment between those three characters. The exchange between Spock and Dr. McCoy where Spock says “Fear of death is illogical” and Dr. McCoy’s reply “Fear of death is what keeps us alive” is a classic Spock-Dr. McCoy interaction. This film looks good visually with shots of the Enterprise, the swarm of enemy vessels, the underground prison, the zero gravity action on buildings and the Enterprise crashing towards the planet. I really like the new effect of travelling at warp speed. The villain Krall has an interesting alien accent.


I will suggest a theory of mine on where the plot could lead to in the film. This is a potential spoiler in case it turns out to be true, so if you are concerned this section may spoil the film for you, I recommend you skip this paragraph. My ideas will be italicised in the following section. Some of the crew meet a female alien named Jaylah on the planet. She could be really working for Krall. It can be seen in the trailer that Captain Kirk, Spock, Dr. McCoy, Scotty and Jaylah all end up on the old Starship USS Franklin that they found which they eventually get up and running, rescue the rest of their crew and go off into space. Krall may have hired her to pretend to be on their side and placed the USS Franklin on the planet knowing that they’d be able to get it up and running. In the trailer Jaylah says “Everyone who goes there, he kills” which could be a line said to make him look evil to them, thus making her appear good which would help her carry out her plan (similar to a deceptive tactic used at the end of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Season 2 when the enemy Jem’Hadar aliens were introduced). Krall could be setting up the Enterprise crew for a trap though Jaylah when they finally reach where it is that they’re going.    

I’m not completely convinced I’ll like the film, but it does look good and made me get more excited about it with the hope that it can be a good film. Close to the end of next month all will be revealed.  

Saturday, 16 January 2016

My Fears and Hopes for Star Trek Beyond

As the Star Trek Beyond trailer along with interviews with people involved in the film appeared last month, I decided to write my thoughts on the film in response to this information. Firstly, I'll say what I think of the previous two films, Star Trek (2009) & Star Trek Into Darkness (2013). I am a Star Trek fan and I would have liked the 2009 film to be a mature intelligent film with a good story, but unfortunately that wasn't the case. However I did enjoy it as it was a good, entertaining film. I liked it how it was based on the original series (the Star Trek crew I like the most) and I loved seeing Leonard Nimoy's Spock (my favourite Star Trek character). I didn't like Star Trek Into Darkness as I found it to be badly written, rehashing material from both the 2009 film and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, a bad choice of villain, Captain Kirk acting youthfully immature (a negative fact of the 2009 film that was worse here) and so on. For me, the 2009 film despite its changes did feel like Star Trek, but Star Trek Into Darkness didn't. I want the next film to be good and feel like Star Trek.



Here are my fears for this film.


Fears
I didn't like the way the trailer was structured and the music used. I fear that it will turn into a mindless action film having a bad story. I was not pleased to hear Chris Pine who plays Captain Kirk say "This one, I can definitively say, has the most action out of any one we’ve done so far." in a Yahoo! Movies set visit. That sounds bad as I found one of the reasons why Star Trek Into Darkness wasn't good was because the action was increased. While I wouldn't say the first film had a good balance between action and story, I thought it was OK in that aspect. The second film however had occasions when the action got in the way of the story. I'm hoping that the action isn't really being increased, but it's just something said to excite people who like action. I'm hoping that it may not mean more action, but more epic action scenes. If there's anything that should be increased it should be the storytelling, not the action. The actors would experience filming action scenes, but ultimately, the pace of the film will be determined by the editors irrespective of what’s shot.


I was disappointed by the fact that it is written by Simon Pegg (also Scotty actor) and Doug Jung. In Simon's case, it's because he was disrespectful to Star Trek fans who didn't like Star Trek Into Darkness, the fact that his previous writing credits have been comedies and the fact that they were rude comedies (a style I don't like) makes me concerned he might put too much comedy into the film and some rude jokes too. Since he hasn't written a non-comedy before, it’s possible he might not be good at it. I also haven't been impressed with his performance as Scotty. Doug Jung doesn't seem to be a good choice to me. There is also the fact that these writers began working on the script around the start of 2015 for a shoot in 6 months which makes it seem like a rush job. I'm not pleased with the choice of Director Justin Lin. A lot of his credits don’t look good, especially the Fast & Furious films which isn't a type of film I like. In response to fan criticism that he's making a Fast & Furious film in the Star Trek universe, Justin said “Yeah, and I don’t know if that’s the case here”. The fact that he said he's not too sure instead of that he's not makes me worried. I get it that those are films he’s made that he’s proud of, but these are two different franchises and making that kind of film in the Star Trek universe is disrespectful to Star Trek. I will now move on into my hopes for the film.


Hopes  
While I didn't like the way the trailer was structured, I did like some of the imagery from the trailer. Hearing some comments from Justin Lin about the story made me feel pleased about it. The idea of the Enterprise crew getting their ship taken out with 40,000 enemy vessels and them being forced to evacuate to this planet could be a good idea if executed well. I do like the design of the villain Krall and the line he says "This is where it begins, Captain. This is where the frontier pushes back". Justin Lin said these comments in a Collider interview:


“I think that at its core I felt like on this chapter if we could kind of deconstruct Trek on different levels and then hopefully reaffirm why it’s great then we can maybe send it off and they’ll have a long run after this, and that to me was kinda on a more cerebral sense, you know, I feel like that was kinda the mission here on this one. ... in this timeline I wanted to hopefully create something where we can be on the five-year mission, we can hopefully explore and push, and introduce new species, and put them in situations where hopefully it then mirrors back and reflects about the exploration of humanity. ... I like his character because his character is really challenging the way of The Federation’s philosophy, I think it’s great being a fan and a lot of times I watch Utopia, East San Francisco, and I always feel like, “Oh wow.” When you’re building this movie, you’re like, “So they don’t have money. How do they live? How do they compete?” And those are things that I think his character in a way has a very distinct and valid point of view.”


These comments give hope that there will be thought-provoking ideas in the film and an interesting villain. I hope that unlike the last film, the Federation's ideals will be portrayed positively. I like it how he mentioned going more on a cerebral sense. This film comes out during the 50th Anniversary so it's important that the film pay respect to Star Trek's legacy and values.


Regarding the Spock & Uhura romance, Justin said in Birth.Movies.Death “What we’re doing is appropriate to the two and a half years. It’s a continuation in a way, and I don’t want to ignore things and act as if they don’t exist, so there’s an acknowledgement and I think their relationship is consistent to the way it was before”. This comment hints that their relationship may not be in the film, which is good to hear as I didn't like it how they were in a relationship in these films. Even if it’s still there, it is likely be reduced according to these comments.


It's good that this film is set two and a half years into the Enterprise's five year mission featuring more exploring and especially the fact that there's many new alien species in this film. Justin said in the Yahoo! Movies set visit said that there'll be five times as many new species than the previous two films put together.    


Final word
There are some signs that this film may turn out in a way that I won't like and there are also other signs that it will turn out in a way that I like. I'm very aware that the type of Star Trek film I want won’t be made by these filmmakers, but I do hope it will take what worked for the 2009 film, have more maturity and bring back Star Trek’s thought-provoking themes. Justin said in Birth.Movies.Death:

“I’m going to use a sports analogy, so forgive me. I can tell you what a great athlete I am, what a great basketball player I am, but when I step on the court you’re going to know very quickly whether I’m any good. In a way I feel like it’s easy to preach what the Federation is about, how you’re supposed to act, but what happens when you [are on your heels]. How do you react?”.

What he says applies to his film as directors promise all kind of good things about their films, but it’s only once the film comes out that we will know how true they were (if at all) to their word.