Showing posts with label Cabinet of Sri Lanka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cabinet of Sri Lanka. Show all posts

Saturday, 26 September 2026

The Need to Revive Sri Lanka’s LRT Project


In 2017, for this blog I interviewed Dr. Dimantha De Silva about the Colombo Transport Plan of the Megapolis Project. He was Consultant/Team Leader of the Colombo Transport Plan. The Megapolis and its Colombo Transport Plan was an initiative of the then Sri Lankan government. This plan included a Light Rail Transit (LRT) system which is a form of rail transit for Sri Lanka’s most populous city Colombo. In March 2019, the Daily News reported that a loan was signed between the Sri Lankan government and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to construct an LRT Line from Malabe to Colombo Fort.


When I was interviewing Dimantha in May 2017, I was concerned that Gotabaya Rajapaksa would become Sri Lanka’s next President and cancel this project. Unfortunately, he was elected President in November 2019. Gotabaya Rajapaksa governed disastrously which culminated in Sri Lanka’s economic collapse in 2022 alongside protests which successfully resulted in his resignation. In September 2020, Gotabaya Rajapaksa terminated the LRT project. It was so tragic to see a positive transportation project get cancelled due to Sri Lanka’s broken political system. It had a very beneficial loan condition for Sri Lanka and the agreement had already been signed with JICA.


On the 23rd of July, the Daily News reported that Minister of Transport, Highways and Urban Development Bimal Rathnayake said in Parliament that a final decision has not currently been made on whether to resume the LRT project. Minister Ratnayake mentioned that compensation has been paid to two companies with one of the Japanese companies requesting additional interest payment for the delay. He also said a special committee has been formed to investigate this issue.


I am of the view that the National People’s Power (NPP) government should revive the LRT project. They are involved in positive transport projects right now. This year, the Metro Bus service was launched which continues to expand. These are modern Foton buses with the service run by the Lanka Metro Transit company. Minister Rathnayake stated in July that Sri Lanka will take steps to introduce an electric railway service in 2027. Its first phase will consist of three routes. He gave an update this month that construction is expected to begin in May or June next year.

   

In July, the Cabinet of Ministers approved a purchase of 600 new deluxe buses with air-conditioning. These buses are for the Sri Lanka Transport Board (SLTB). Minister Rathnayake mentioned in Parliament earlier this month that many new expressways will start construction before the end of 2026. The government just launched a national program to make dangerous and unsafe parts of roads outside of highways safe. On the 18th of this month, the government signed Memorandums of Understanding for this program with local government bodies. Prasanna Gunasena, Deputy Minister of Transport and Highways revealed on the 20th that the construction of Kandy’s Mahaiyawa’s underpass is about 80% done with it aiming to be finished by December. The purpose of the underpass is to improve commuter access to Kandy and to help reduce Kandy’s traffic congestion.


Japan is involved with the Sri Lankan government’s current transport initiatives. Around the beginning of this month, the Japanese government donated seven low-floor buses to Sri Lanka in order to enhance the Sri Lankan public transport system. These bus donations are by both the Japanese government and residents of Yokohama, Japan. This is part of the Metro Bus service as the donated buses were handed over to Lanka Metro Transit, the company responsible for the Metro Buses.


The Japanese government’s development agency JICA who were set to give the LRT loan is currently involved in Sri Lankan development projects. JICA is involved in setting up a Doppler Weather Radar Network in Puttalam. It is being constructed right now and expected to be completed next year. This is funded by Japan’s Grant Aid and will help Sri Lanka prepare for disasters. JICA provided loans for two cardiac treatment complexes in Trincomalee and Anuradhapura which just began construction. In July, Sri Lanka’s second largest water supply project was launched. JICA funded this Anuradhapura North Water Supply Project - Phase II. This month, it was reported that the Kalu Ganga Water project is about to begin. It’s a JICA loan servicing drinking water needs of families in the Colombo and Kalutara districts.


Colombo having an LRT system would greatly assist with travel as the city has too many vehicles on the roads. An LRT would enable people to travel to destinations on the list at a faster speed. It is elevated keeping it separate from regular traffic on its route enabling those vehicles to go faster due to the LRT usage. Colombo’s LRT has great potential to improve Sri Lanka’s economy. Dimantha told me how his mentors and professors in Calgary, Canada (where he lived prior to my interview and lives presently) talked about how Calgary grew and its economic levels increased when Calgary’s LRT system was introduced. He also said that it enabled investors to come in for other projects. This provides potential benefits such a system would have in Sri Lanka.


As Dimantha stated to me, Sri Lanka won’t be eligible for the LRT loan once we elevate to an upper middle income country. This loan has a 0.1% interest rate for a 40 year period and has a 10 year grace period. Sri Lanka was not an upper middle income country when the interview was conducted. We reached this classification by the World Bank in July 2019, only to lose it one year later. The World Bank improved Sri Lanka’s classification this July, returning it to an upper middle income country.


Sri Lanka’s status as an upper middle income country poses challenges to a loan for a revived LRT project as we are no longer eligible for it. If we were to negotiate with JICA on reviving the LRT, we could request it to consist of the original loan conditions when it was signed. If that is not possible, there are other options to look at which could include getting other countries or organisations also involved to ease the cost. It’s important to try to have an agreement on reviving the project including compensation payments reimbursed or at least have the interest compensation requirement cancelled.


Sri Lanka collaborating with JICA on the current development projects can help us in negotiating for a revival of Colombo’s LRT. In January 2025, Minister Rathnayake took a train ride as a regular passenger. Passengers approached him about issues the train service faces. This is a positive action by the Minister in reaching out to the people and their issues. He could use his experiences of travelling on a train and learning of the passengers’ issues as a reason to see the value of a LRT system operating in Sri Lanka, both due the common value of the train & LRT and how an improved system could address passengers’ issues. The LRT can be integrated into the government’s transport initiatives. LRT would complement the current transport projects well. Metro Buses can go to LRT locations linking the two systems to benefit each other.


In light of the government’s positive transport initiatives and work with JICA, I see the LRT as a Sri Lankan project which should be revived. The fact that Japan also donated buses to Sri Lanka this year is a case of them collaborating with the current government on transport which could help with an LRT revival. An LRT system would revolutionise Colombo’s transport sector and bring tangible benefits to Sri Lanka enabling the country to develop further.

Saturday, 15 October 2022

An Overview & Evaluation of the Senate of Ceylon

Sri Lanka when it was previously known as Ceylon had a Senate. The Senate of Ceylon began in 1947 (one year prior to Ceylon’s independence from Britain) and was part of Ceylon’s Parliament. Parliament initially consisted of two houses with the House of Representatives as the Lower House and the Senate as the Upper House. There were 30 members of the Senate with half of them elected by the House of Representatives and the other half nominated by the Governor-General (a representative of the British Monarch) who was acting on the Prime Minister’s advice. In this article, I will be having a look at how the Senate functioned and discuss the idea of having a Senate again in the context of Sri Lanka’s current problems.


The Senate was established via the Soulbury Constitution, Ceylon’s first constitution. I will be having a look at some sections in the Ceylon (Constitution) Order in Council, 1946 related to the Senate. The conditions of the Senate that I refer to come from the period of its establishment. It is possible there had been changes made to them during the duration of the Senate. The Senate was a permanent body unaffected when Parliament was dissolved. A Senator should have been at least 35 years old who served a six year term and a third of Senators were required to retire every other year. The Senate was required at its first meeting to elect two members to serve as President and Deputy-President of the Senate. 


According to the 1956 book “Ceylon and Her Citizens” by I.D.S. & Marguerite I. Weerawardena, the Senate did not have much power. The authors point out that the Senate could share its perspectives, ask questions and be critical of the government. However, unlike the House of Representatives, it could not be an obstacle to the Cabinet. The House of Representatives could do this by declining to provide money requested by the government or by declining to pass laws the government brings. The Senate was incapable of doing these things as the House had the power to override the Senate’s decisions.


After a bill was passed by the House, it got sent to the Senate. The Senate could pass the bill or reject it. If the bill was passed, it would be sent to the Governor-General who usually approved it making it an Act of Parliament. If the Senate rejected the bill, that gave it power to delay the bill by approximately one year until it got sent to the Governor-General as long as the bill got passed a second time by the House. If the bill was related to financial matters, the Senate could only delay the bill by one month. 


Dr. Nihal Jayawickrama wrote an article worth reading called “The Abolition Of The Senate”. The article gives the story behind the abolition of the Senate in 1971. I am not going to discuss the abolition of the Senate, but I found it interesting how he said in his article: “The Senate was one of the five constitutional safeguards that were included in the 1946 Constitution in order to remove the fear of “domination and oppression” by a “permanent and unassailable majority” which existed especially in the minds of Ceylon’s ethnic and religious minorities.” This makes me think if the Senate was beneficial for minorities.  


I wonder if the Senate could have been helpful for this decade with the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna’s (SLPP) disastrous governance. It’s possible that if the Senate existed now, the SLPP could also have received a two-thirds majority in the Senate like they did at the last Parliamentary election. Section 10.3 of the Ceylon (Constitution) Order in Council, 1946, mentioned that the Governor-General should work to appoint public servants with valuable service or respected professionals. This is referring to the 15 Senators appointed by the Governor-General. I wonder if the Senate in the present context could bring in individuals of suitable quality who don’t usually contest elections. If it was working as expected, it would provide a much needed improvement to governance. Due to the limited functions of the Senate as mentioned above, it seems unlikely it would have been able to protect independent institutions from interference by politicians such as the Rajapaksas. 


The SLPP have been acting so shamelessly. They continue to pander to the Rajapaksas, wanting them to make a comeback. If the Senate was functioning properly with a majority not with the SLPP, they could be standing for justice. The Senate may have been able to delay the passage of the 20th Amendment by one year. They could have provided the necessary work of an opposition which has been lacking by the opposition party, the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB). Something to think about is whether the Senate could have prevented the devastating economic crisis Sri Lanka is facing right now. Of course, if the Senate had not been abolished in 1971, Sri Lanka’s history is likely to have been quite different. The present state may not be anything like it is right now. 


As I wasn’t alive during the Senate of Ceylon and due to the limited amount of information I was able to find on the Senate, this is only a snapshot view of the topic rather than a detailed analysis. I have been thinking if it would be beneficial for Sri Lanka to have a Senate again. I’d be interested in hearing from those who were alive during the Senate of Ceylon of how it functioned and your thoughts on if the Senate would be beneficial to Sri Lanka’s present state. 

Wednesday, 18 November 2020

Sri Lanka 50 Years of Metric: The Metrication Story

 

Trilingual Logo of the National Metric Conversion Authority (SLNA 143/61)


This year marks the 50th anniversary of Sri Lanka’s decision to adopt the metric system which was a major transformation undergone in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka had used the imperial system prior to its adoption of the metric system as the country is a former British colony. This article aims to give the story of how Sri Lanka switched to the metric system, providing the details behind the decision to adopt this system and describe what happened in the metrication process.


It’s worth noting that Sri Lanka was previously known as Ceylon, with the country’s name changing to Sri Lanka in 1972. This article will use the name Ceylon for events prior to 1972 and the name Sri Lanka for events post 1972. Similarly, the Bureau of Ceylon Standards changed their name to the Sri Lanka Standards Institute in 1974, so I refer to them in their current name post 1974. All the images featured except the one relating to the National Metrication Board were taken at the National Archives of Sri Lanka. They were taken from the Archives Holding #143 of the National Metric Conversion Authority and feature the details below each image. 


Metric Usage in Pre-Metric Times

Similar to how there is currently some metric usage in the non-metric USA, there was limited usage of the metric system in Ceylon prior to its adoption. I’ll mention some of it. Ceylon’s Rupee currency had a metric related structure being in the decimal format of 100 cents to a rupee when it started in 1872. It’s unknown when it began, but cubic centimetres (cc) were used for motorcycle engine sizes in pre-metric times. Metric units had been taught for science in senior secondary schools and universities. The metric units used were older versions of the metric system, such as the centimetre-gram-second system of units (cgs).


The agricultural sector had some metric usage alongside imperial early. As far back as the 1950s, the tea industry had use of Celsius and grams for soil. That decade also had use of grams per tree tapping in the rubber industry. In the 1960s, the rubber industry had usage of litres including grams and milligrams per litre. Similarly, in the same decade this industry reported usage of Celsius, millilitres, millimetres, kilograms per square centimetre, square centimetres and centimetres. In the 1960s, grams per litre was used for blood samples in medicine.


It’s interesting to note that the Bureau of Ceylon Standards published Ceylon’s first standard in 1967 in an A5 size document. A5 (half of A4 paper) is part of the international (metric) paper sizes, which I don’t believe had been adopted by Ceylon at that time. This corresponds with the beginning of Ceylon’s metrication as covered in the next section.


Discussions to Adopt

In 1966, the organisations the Ceylon Institute for Engineering and the Ceylon Association for the Advancement of Science (now the Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science) jointly urged the Government of Ceylon to consider adopting the metric system. Following that, the Bureau of Ceylon Standards formed a study group known as a Metric Divisional Committee to research the issue of Ceylon adopting the metric system. They then provided a report recommending the adoption of the metric system to the Minister of Industries and Fisheries on 24th June 1969. According to this report, among well-informed individuals there was an overwhelming desire for Sri Lanka to switch to the metric system. The Bureau of Ceylon Standards also began producing standards for the use of metric units in Ceylon. In 1969, this included standards for structural and general engineering purposes.


Adoption/Introduction of the Metric System

One year later, the Government of Ceylon decided to adopt the metric system in June 1970. The first major step they made was the setting up of the National Metrication Board. The Board’s two tasks were to prepare an implementation plan and an estimate of the expected costs of metrication. One of the Bureau of Ceylon Standards’ new metric standards in 1970 included the standard CS 99 : 1970 “Conversion Factors and Tables”. This was part of a group of standards produced at the time to facilitate international standards and practices while metricating to enable a smooth conversion.


The National Metrication Board composed of Dr. Ronald T. Wijewantha (Chairman) and Dr. G.M.S. de Silva (Secretary) with the remaining members Mr. B.J.P. Alles & Mr. E.L. Wijemanne, Mr. Eardley de Silva, Dr. M.A.V. Devanathan, Mr. Albert Edirisinghe, Mr. C.T. Elangasekera, Mr. H.L.K. Goonetilleke, Prof. S.R. Kottegoda, Prof. U.S. Kuruppu, Mr. A.M.S. Perera, Mr. D.H.N. Perera, Mr. K.D.T. Samarasinghe and Mr. N. Satyendra. There are at least two other individuals who were members of the National Metrication Board during its tenure being Mr. Baldwyn Perera and Dr. U.B.M. Ekanayake who sadly died young at the age of 32 in 1972. Both the Chairman and the Secretary of the National Metrication Board were from the Bureau of Ceylon Standards with its members comprising a variety of fields including universities, government ministries, plantations, science, opticianry and the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce.

  

List of the National Metrication Board members and its Panels courtesy Dr. G.M.S. de Silva


The Secretary of the National Metrication Board, Dr. G.M.S. de Silva was also incharge of the metrication division of the Bureau of Ceylon Standards. He says “This division prepared the sectoral programs of conversion as well as the new Sri Lanka standards required.” He adds “A number of sectoral committees were appointed to prepare the programs for different sectors of the economy. I acted as the secretary of these committees and guided them in the preparation of the sectoral conversion programs.” Dr. de Silva also conducted many seminars to both government and private sector organisations explaining metric units and the approaches to be taken for the conversion. He lists the end of the National Metrication Board as “when the Weights & Measures Division of the Ministry of Commerce took over the metric conversion activities they decided to disband the National Metrication Board.” 


In 1971, the Bureau of Ceylon Standards’ metric standards produced included school chalk, cement and tea chests. According to a speech National Metrication Board member Mr. H.L.K. Goonetilleke gave at an October 1971 Training Workshop on Metrology in Japan, there are legal issues to consider such as the fact that the metric system was not currently legal in Ceylon. He stated that the then present imperial system would have to continue alongside the metric system during the conversion. The plan was to feature both metric and imperial units in the schedules of Ceylon’s weights and measures law amendment. Ceylon’s law allowed schedules to be amended via the Government Gazette without the need for Parliamentary approval. Once metric conversion was finished in a specific sector, the imperial units for that sector would be deleted.


In 1972, the Bureau of Ceylon Standards’ metric standards produced included wheat flour, white bread and drawing boards. The National Metrication Board presented its report to the Minister of Industries and Scientific Affairs that year. The implementation plan was the key part of the National Metrication Board's report which provided a 10 year time frame for the conversion. According to former Surveyor General of Sri Lanka T. Somasekaram in page 125 of his book “Surveying Stories” (2001), in 1972 he was part of a Survey Department Metrication Committee alongside Mr. R.A. Goonewardene and Mr. A.M. Cumaraswamy. After they produced a report, Mr. Somasekaram went to India (which had adopted the metric system in the 1950s) the following year for a Commonwealth study tour to compare the Survey Department’s conversion proposals with how India carried out its conversion in that field.


In the early 1970s, the London Tea Board (a destination for exports of Ceylon Tea) began operating solely in metric units. They wanted tea sent to them packed in metric sizes or at least having the equivalent weight in kilograms provided. They provided Sri Lanka conversion tables which on investigation revealed that each tea chest was required to be rounded down to the closest lower kilogram value. From basic calculations done on a year with low tea prices, it revealed that Sri Lanka would encounter a significant loss of revenue this way. This event probably speeded up the country’s commitment to metrication.


In 1973, metrication in the rubber industry included converting gauges, scales, charts and measuring vessels to metric. The Bureau of Ceylon Standards’ new metric standards included untrimmed paper sizes & paper board, files & folders and rulers. The Cabinet of Sri Lanka ratified key metrication recommendations from the National Metrication Board’s report. Plans for implementation were set-up via the Ministry of Internal and Foreign Trade with the National Metric Conversion Authority established.


The Ceylon Institute of Marketing (now the Sri Lanka Institute of Marketing) created ‘Your guide to Metric units’ posters presumably in consultation with the National Metric Conversion Authority educating the public about metric units. These posters were part of a campaign known as ‘Think easy think Metric’.  


Your guide to Metric units poster on weight (SLNA 143/33)


Your guide to Metric units poster on length (SLNA 143/36)


Legislation

A major step of legislation was to amend the Weights and Measures Law in Sri Lanka. This law was the Weights and Measures (Amendment) Law No. 24 of 1974. It established the metric system as Sri Lanka’s base units of measurement. The version of the metric system adopted was the International System of Units (SI). SI Units is the most modern form of the metric system, which was established during the General Conference of Weights and Measures (CGM) in 1960. The Sri Lanka Standards Institute’s new metric standards in 1974 included building timber, plastic spectacle frames and ISO metric screw threads. Conversion for the rubber export industry began that year.


Sri Lanka’s customs went metric in 1975, according to Vol. 5, No. 6 (page 5) of the Canadian publication “Metric monitor” (1978). On the 2nd of April 1975, the Colombo Tea Auction went metric selling teas per kilogram. On the 24th of June 1975, the Coconut Marketing Board gave instructions to auctioneers, shippers and millers to use metric units in transactions of Coconut Oil, Copra, Desiccated Coconut and Coconut Shell Charcoal. These changes came into effect on the 1st of July 1975. Exports and imports had converted to the metric system on a voluntary basis by the end of 1975. It was voluntary as the National Metric Conversion Authority lacked the authority to enforce a conversion to the metric system. This would be rectified with legislation the following year.


The National Metric Conversion Law was passed in Parliament in 1976. It gave the National Metric Conversion Authority powers to implement the conversion to the metric system. According to the law, the Authority consisted of seven members appointed by the Minister. The members are the Chairman who belonged to the Weights and Measures Division assigned with the topic of Trade, four representatives from the Ministry assigned with the topics Industries, Planning, Finance & Local Government, a representative from the Sri Lanka Standards Institute and someone who was not a public officer who was familiar with business activities. The Minister had the power to increase the number of members of the Authority up to eight. All members of the Authority except for the Chairman were to be part of the Authority for three years unless they left office by resignation, death or removal. The Minister was to decide the length of the Chairman’s term of office.


The National Metric Conversion Authority comprised five technical and two administrative staff according to “Metric monitor” (1978) Vol. 5, No. 6 (page 5). Its members included Mr. H.L.K. Goonetilleke (Chairman), Dr. Thilaka S. Weerakoon (Director), Mr. H.L.R.W. Madanayake and Mrs. Devalakshmi Balasundaram. It’s interesting to note that Mr. Goonetilleke was part of both the National Metrication Board and the National Metric Conversion Authority.


The exact titles the last two individuals held is not known, but Mrs. Balasundaram was in charge of all the legislative changes for Sri Lanka’s metric conversion. Her colleague Mr. Madanayake paid tribute to her work on metrication in her obituary as “It was during the metric conversion of Sri Lanka, Mrs. Balasundaram joined the small group of officers who formed the core group, managing the metric conversion under the leadership of Late H.L.K. Goonetilleke, the chairman of the National Metric Conversion Authority. Her main task was the drafting of the acts. Regulation and direction under the metric conversion, proposed by the technical committee had to be implemented, legally. She had the required knowledge, skill and attitude for the task. The scientists in the technical committees knew very little law and the legal professionals knew only a little science. A bridge was required to span this gap and Devalakshmi fitted in perfectly. She could question the technocrats at length to get their ideas in an understandable way to transform them into a form more suited to the legal world”. He adds of her role in amending laws as “Even during the metrication periods, the department relied on her for advice on the legal problems arising from other acts and ordinances the department was implementing.”


Conversion Process

The National Metric Conversion Authority produced posters in English, Sinhala and Tamil. One series was about different fields of measurement e.g. Measurement of Temperature. Examples of these posters are given below.


Poster on Temperature in English (SLNA 143/57)


Poster on Temperature in Sinhala (SLNA 143/55)


Poster on Volume in Tamil (SLNA 143/53)


One aspect of Sri Lanka’s metrication was the setting up of the Standard Weights and Measures Laboratory as reported in Vol. 7, No. 6 (page 2) of “Metric monitor” (1980). Metric measurement standards were obtained by this laboratory during Sri Lanka’s metric conversion. It’s interesting to note that there was another institute involved in metrication known as the National Metrication Institute. They had published a Tamil publication known as ‘Ilankaiyam metri alavai muroyum’. Information about who they were and their function is not available.


In 1976, the National Metric Conversion Authority’s plans for the year included work in the import trade, primary export products and initiating changes in industry. 2.89% of weights and measures tested and stamped as part of the Weights and Measures Ordinance were in metric units, indicating that conversion was just beginning in the sale of food vendors. Two factories, being the National Textile Corporation Factory and the Lanka Wall Tiles Factory were designed and built in metric units. Kilometre signs were installed by the Department of Highways on A class roads. A class roads, also known as trunk roads, connect provincial cities with major ports.


There was a press publicity campaign carried out on the metric system. The Agro-Exhibition event in Nuwara Eliya featured a metrication stall. The National Metric Conversion Authority published two agricultural publications which were “A Metric Guide for the Rubber Grower” and “A Metric Guide for the Tea Grower”. Major changes began in the industrial and plantation sectors and following that in civil engineering and education. According to Vol. 4, No, 20 (page 8) of US publication “Metric Reporter” (1976), in the last quarter of the year there was incredible success in the conversion of exports. All major exports which included tea, rubber, coconut, spices and citronella oil were all mentioned, packaged and auctioned in metric units.


“A Metric Guide for the Tea Grower” publication (SLNA 143/1 A.B.)


Page from the publication on conversion (SLNA 143/1 A.B.)


During 1977, the Sri Lanka Standards Institute’s involvement in metricating Sri Lanka Standards included volume measures, metric measuring spoons & cups, engineering, textiles, paper sizes, doors & windows and road signs & symbols. Assistant Director of Standardisation at the Sri Lanka Standards Institute Mr. Rasa Rajeswaran was actively involved in metrication. There were two notable seminars on metrication that year. Firstly, the Agrarian Research & Training Institute hosted one on metrication and measurements in industry. Secondly, the National Metric Conversion Authority in collaboration with the State Engineering Corporation and the Asian Productivity Organisation were responsible for a seminar dealing with metrication in the construction industry in November 1977. The event was called “On Rationalisation in the Building and Housing Industry with Emphasis on Metrication”. This seminar produced a paper called “Effects of Metric Conversion on Quantity Surveyors and Estimation” by Mr. H.D. Chandrasena.


In 1978, metric usage for manufacturers was in the early stages with 15% operating in metric, 60% converting and 25% planning as mentioned in Vol. 5, No. 6 (page 5) of “Metric monitor” (1978). Major progress was achieved that year. The National Metric Conversion Authority collaborated with other agencies to produce the manual “Recommended Practice for Building Drawing”. This manual related to the engineering sector, enabling building plans and building drawings to be developed in metric units. For the timber industry, tables were produced on timber production and application. Registration specifications for motor vehicle licences were prepared in the metric system. The Department of Health prepared the document “A Guide for Metric Dispensing”. The National Metric Conversion Authority provided assistance to the Department of Agriculture to function in metric units by the end of the year. On 16th August 1978, the Metric Units (Consequential Provisions) Law, No. 40 of 1978 was certified. This law amended existing laws to incorporate metric units. The newly set-up Urban Development Authority defined commercial buildings in metric terms as those having built-up areas above 10,000 square metres. According to Vol. 7, No. 6 (page 2) of “Metric monitor”, textiles began being sold per metre in October 1978. The sale of petrol in litres began in Colombo as well as in the other two key cities of Kandy and Galle. This initiative was gradually rolled out to other parts of the country. 


In 1979, there was another amendment to Sri Lanka’s weights and measures law. This law was the Weights and Measures (Amendment) Act, No. 16 of 1979. Its changes dealt with the role of price control inspectors and definitions of metric units in length, area, volume & two scientific units dealing with radiation. According to Vol. 7, No. 6 (page 2) of “Metric monitor” (1980), sectors with remarkable progress of full or partial metric usage in 1980 included packaged goods, industry, education (SI was taught in high schools and partially for architectural students & technical faculties), statistics, construction & civil engineering, road & railway transportation (road signs for speed & distance in kilometres and vehicle features) and agriculture (tea, rubber and paddy). 


In an April 1980 speech by Sri Lankan Assistant Superintendent of Weights and Measures Mr. A.P.H.G. De Waas Gunawardena in Washington D.C., he mentioned two interesting points about Sri Lanka’s metrication. Firstly, when it came to products sold in packages and containers, the items tea, toothpaste & paint began to be sold in fixed metric sizes under the metric conversion law. For other products, it is valid if the equivalent metric size was mentioned. Secondly, the petrol pumps originally used imperial gallons (4.55 litres) and were being converted into litres. Following the conversion, inspectors verified and stamped the petrol pumps. These petrol pumps’ numbers spin indicating the amount of fuel loaded. As litres are more than four times smaller than gallons, a frequent problem occurred of it spinning too fast resulting in the device breaking down more frequently. In addition to this, the petrol pump meter often went out of calibration and required an inspector to break the mark of authentication. Petrol station dealers would have to get their broken down pumps repaired fast to serve their customers.


During the 1980 - 1981 period, conversion was carried out in the work of the Survey Department. Work had begun on improving the readability of the 1 kilogram scale which presumably related to food vendors. The National Metric Conversion Authority collaborated with the Petroleum Corporation for a pilot project testing petrol pumps. Similarly, they also collaborated with the University of Colombo’s Department of Physics on three under-graduate projects. In 1981, the National Metric Conversion Authority tasked about 10 individuals to repair & manufacture weights & measures. During that year, the Motor Traffic Act was amended as the Motor Traffic (Amendment) Act No. 21 of 1981 changing its regulations from imperial to metric. Similarly, the Coast Conservation Act No. 57 of 1981 was enacted which incorporated new metric environmental regulations using the units hectares, cubic metres, metres and kilometres. The Sri Lanka Standards Institute made amendments to standards which included CS 5 : 1970, CS 30 : 1968 and CS 69 : 1969. These amendments were changing them from being in both imperial and metric to metric only.


As a result of the 1977 building and housing metrication seminar mentioned above, a decision was made to have a Sri Lankan Method of Measurement for construction projects. This was sponsored by the National Metric Conversion Authority with a committee appointed to develop this standard. It was published in 1982 by the Sri Lanka Standards Institute as “Standard Method of Building Works - SLS 573.1982”. On 10th February 1983, the Metric Units (Consequential Provisions) (Amendment) Act, No. 10 of 1983 was certified which amended the previous Metric Units (Consequential Provisions) Law, No. 40 of 1978. This law amended existing laws to incorporate metric units. Sectors affected by this law included electricity, bread, estates, rubber, tea, housing and customs.


Final Thoughts 

Metrication was an important transformation undergone in Sri Lanka modernising its measurements making them up to date with international standards. It’s good to know that metrication was one of the few issues in Sri Lanka with a bipartisan political consensus according to page 39 of T. Somasekaram’s book “Surveying Stories” (2001).


There are some individuals who I communicated with who helped me write this article. Thank you very much to Secretary of the National Metrication Board Dr. G.M.S. de Silva, President of the US Metric Association Dr. Don Hillger, Assistant Director (Standardisation) of the Sri Lanka Standards Institute Mr. Rasa Rajeswaran, Director General of the National Archives of Sri Lanka Dr. Nadeera Rupesinghe and Emeritus Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Moratuwa Prof. Rohan Lucas for their help. Click here to read part two of Sri Lanka’s metrication story, dealing with the continued metrication after the National Metric Conversion Authority’s disbandment and an evaluation of Sri Lanka’s metrication based on its current metric usage. To those who lived through Sri Lanka’s metrication, feel free to share memories from it. I’d be interested to hear things I was not really able to cover such as how the food vendors and temperature converted. It would be nice to hear if anyone has any interesting stories from metrication.